Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Japan Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Immigrants from Japan
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Immigrants from Japan
11.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Japan Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,970,010 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,141,338 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Immigrants from Japan |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 58.2% | 54.8% |
| Range | 56.0% | 52.9% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 13.2% |
| Median | 10.1% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Japan by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Argentina (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Argentinean (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and Egyptian (11.1%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Cypriot (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Argentineans | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |