European vs Bahamian Male Disability
COMPARE
European
Bahamian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Europeans
Bahamians
12.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
MALE DISABILITY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Bahamian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,596,268 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,681,735 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | European | Bahamian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 29.9% |
Range | 98.6% | 25.4% |
Mean | 18.6% | 12.6% |
Median | 14.0% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.1% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Europeans and Bahamians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Swiss (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Basque (12.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Belgian (12.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Chinese (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and British (12.1%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Northern European (11.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Samoan (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Italian (11.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Laos (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Italians | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.9% |
Czechs | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.9% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.9% |
Northern Europeans | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.9% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.0 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 1.0 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.9% |
Danes | 0.9 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hungarians | 0.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.0% |
Poles | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.0% |
German Russians | 0.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.0% |
Slovenes | 0.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.5 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.0% |
British | 0.4 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.1% |
Chinese | 0.4 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.1% |
Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.1% |
Europeans | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
Basques | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Belgians | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |