Ethiopian vs Slovak Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Slovak
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Ethiopians
Slovaks
22.7%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
87.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.5%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Slovak Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,880,036 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230 and weighted average of 22.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,207,671 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 22.5%, a difference of 0.62%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Slovak |
| Minimum | 8.9% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 28.8% | 78.0% |
| Range | 19.9% | 70.9% |
| Mean | 21.3% | 26.4% |
| Median | 22.0% | 23.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.6% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 29.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Slovaks by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Taiwanese (22.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ukraine (22.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Moldova (22.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Afghan (22.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Northern European (22.6%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Lebanese (22.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Western Europe (22.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Norwegian (22.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (22.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Czechs | 93.5 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 93.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Hungarians | 93.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Norwegians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.3 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 22.5% |
| Lebanese | 92.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 22.5% |
| Slovaks | 91.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 90.1 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Costa Ricans | 89.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Northern Europeans | 88.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Afghans | 88.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 22.6% |
| Ethiopians | 87.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Taiwanese | 87.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 87.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Ugandans | 85.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 22.7% |
| Belgians | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 22.7% |