Cuban vs British Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Cuban
 British
 Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Cubans
British
23.3%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
51.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.0%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs British Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,265,538 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 23.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,866,970 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 23.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
 
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | British | 
| Minimum | 6.9% | 10.0% | 
| Maximum | 38.5% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 31.6% | 90.0% | 
| Mean | 22.7% | 38.7% | 
| Median | 22.9% | 27.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 21.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 50.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 28.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 25.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 25.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Cubans and British by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are German (23.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Yugoslavian (23.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Moroccan (23.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Icelander (23.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Pakistani (23.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Sri Lankan (23.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Asia (23.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (23.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Czechoslovakian (23.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (23.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 | 
| Slavs | 75.2 /100 | #153  | Good 23.0%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 74.0 /100 | #154  | Good 23.0%  | 
| British | 73.9 /100 | #155  | Good 23.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 73.8 /100 | #156  | Good 23.0%  | 
| Czechoslovakians | 72.4 /100 | #157  | Good 23.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 69.1 /100 | #158  | Good 23.1%  | 
| South American Indians | 65.5 /100 | #159  | Good 23.1%  | 
| Koreans | 64.2 /100 | #160  | Good 23.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 63.8 /100 | #161  | Good 23.1%  | 
| Europeans | 61.2 /100 | #162  | Good 23.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 61.1 /100 | #163  | Good 23.2%  | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 60.9 /100 | #164  | Good 23.2%  | 
| Vietnamese | 60.8 /100 | #165  | Good 23.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 60.5 /100 | #166  | Good 23.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 57.6 /100 | #167  | Average 23.2%  | 
| Pakistanis | 57.0 /100 | #168  | Average 23.2%  | 
| Icelanders | 54.3 /100 | #169  | Average 23.3%  | 
| Moroccans | 54.2 /100 | #170  | Average 23.3%  | 
| Cubans | 51.9 /100 | #171  | Average 23.3%  | 
| Germans | 50.5 /100 | #172  | Average 23.3%  | 
| Yugoslavians | 50.2 /100 | #173  | Average 23.3%  |