Crow vs Inupiat Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Crow
 Inupiat
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Crow
Inupiat
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Inupiat Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,194,968 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,419 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 13.2%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Inupiat | 
| Minimum | 0.69% | 2.3% | 
| Maximum | 17.5% | 19.6% | 
| Range | 16.8% | 17.3% | 
| Mean | 5.7% | 7.0% | 
| Median | 4.6% | 6.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 9.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 4.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Crow and Inupiat by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 1.8%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 2.1%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |