Comanche vs Inupiat Vision Disability
COMPARE
Comanche
Inupiat
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Comanche
Inupiat
2.8%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Inupiat Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,767,498 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,318,866 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 7.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 13.1% | 10.0% |
| Range | 11.8% | 8.9% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 3.6% |
| Median | 3.6% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Inupiat by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Paiute (2.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Tlingit-Haida (2.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Black/African American (2.8%, a difference of 2.0%), Hopi (2.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and Cherokee (2.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), American (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Dominican (2.6%, a difference of 0.91%), Blackfeet (2.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and Osage (2.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |