Chippewa vs Immigrants from China Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from China
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from China
15.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from China Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,987,125 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,491,862 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 72.0%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 56.1% | 26.5% |
| Range | 54.1% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 21.1% | 7.2% |
| Median | 18.4% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.3% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Apache (14.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 0.66%), Potawatomi (14.8%, a difference of 1.4%), Comanche (14.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and Black/African American (14.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Bolivia (8.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Iranian (8.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (8.8%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Israel (8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and Thai (8.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |