Chinese vs Latvian Disability Age 18 to 34

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Chinese Latvians

COMPARE

Chinese

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw ChileanChineseChippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Latvian

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean LaotianLatvianLebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Disability Age 18 to 34

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17Disability Age 18 to 34Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

Disability Age 18 to 34 Comparison

Chinese

Latvians

Exceptional

Poor

6.3%

DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34

91.9/ 100

METRIC RATING

128th/ 347

METRIC RANK

6.8%

DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34

11.1/ 100

METRIC RATING

210th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Chinese vs Latvian Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,771,320 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,392,708 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 8.2%.

Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chinese	Latvian
Minimum	1.9%	0.83%
Maximum	18.0%	41.2%
Range	16.1%	40.3%
Mean	6.8%	10.8%
Median	6.6%	7.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.4%	6.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.1%	10.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.8%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.2%	9.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.2%	9.1%

Similar Demographics by Disability Age 18 to 34

Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age 18 to 34

In terms of disability age 18 to 34, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are West Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Macedonian (6.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Morocco (6.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Costa Rican (6.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 18 to 34
Immigrants \| Guatemala	93.4 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	93.3 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 6.3%
Costa Ricans	92.9 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Morocco	92.9 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 6.3%
Macedonians	92.6 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	92.5 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 6.3%
West Indians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 6.3%
Chinese	91.9 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Italy	90.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Dominica	90.5 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	90.4 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 6.3%
Guatemalans	89.6 /100 \| #132	Excellent 6.4%
Brazilians	89.0 /100 \| #133	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| Europe	88.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 6.4%
Palestinians	88.5 /100 \| #135	Excellent 6.4%

Demographics Similar to Latvians by Disability Age 18 to 34

In terms of disability age 18 to 34, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Norway (6.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Mexican (6.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Japanese (6.8%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Disability Age 18 to 34
Hispanics or Latinos	13.8 /100 \| #203	Poor 6.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	13.6 /100 \| #204	Poor 6.8%
Lebanese	13.3 /100 \| #205	Poor 6.8%
Japanese	12.8 /100 \| #206	Poor 6.8%
Mexicans	12.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 6.8%
Immigrants \| Scotland	12.4 /100 \| #208	Poor 6.8%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	12.3 /100 \| #209	Poor 6.8%
Latvians	11.1 /100 \| #210	Poor 6.8%
Immigrants \| Norway	10.0 /100 \| #211	Tragic 6.8%
Luxembourgers	9.4 /100 \| #212	Tragic 6.9%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	9.1 /100 \| #213	Tragic 6.9%
Serbians	8.2 /100 \| #214	Tragic 6.9%
Immigrants \| Thailand	7.5 /100 \| #215	Tragic 6.9%
Sudanese	7.0 /100 \| #216	Tragic 6.9%
Immigrants \| Kenya	6.9 /100 \| #217	Tragic 6.9%