Chinese vs Latvian 9th Grade

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics

COMPARE

Chinese

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw ChileanChineseChippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Latvian

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean LaotianLatvianLebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

9th Grade

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade9th Grade10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

9th Grade Comparison

Chinese

Latvians

Exceptional

96.3%

9TH GRADE

100.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

29th/ 347

METRIC RANK

96.4%

9TH GRADE

100.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

24th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Chinese vs Latvian 9th Grade Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,808,307 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with at least 9th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 96.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,726,265 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with at least 9th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 96.4%, a difference of 0.060%.

9th Grade Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chinese	Latvian
Minimum	91.7%	94.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	8.3%	5.6%
Mean	97.2%	98.6%
Median	97.5%	99.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	96.2%	97.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	98.6%	100.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.4%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	1.9%	1.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	1.9%	1.4%

Demographics Similar to Chinese and Latvians by 9th Grade

In terms of 9th grade, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Scotch-Irish (96.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Eastern European (96.3%, a difference of 0.0%), French Canadian (96.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Maltese (96.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and British (96.3%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are French (96.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), European (96.4%, a difference of 0.040%), French Canadian (96.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Alaskan Athabascan (96.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	9th Grade
Croatians	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 96.5%
Dutch	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 96.5%
Scandinavians	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 96.5%
Welsh	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 96.4%
Italians	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 96.4%
Alaskan Athabascans	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 96.4%
Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 96.4%
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 96.4%
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 96.4%
French	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 96.3%
French Canadians	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 96.3%
Scotch-Irish	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 96.3%
Eastern Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 96.3%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 96.3%
Maltese	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 96.3%
British	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 96.3%
Belgians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 96.3%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 96.3%
Hungarians	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 96.2%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 96.2%
Northern Europeans	99.9 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 96.2%