Chilean vs Immigrants from Cameroon Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Immigrants from Cameroon
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chileans
Immigrants from Cameroon
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Immigrants from Cameroon Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,632,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,739,199 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cameroon and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.27%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Immigrants from Cameroon |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 13.0% | 13.7% |
| Range | 10.9% | 10.8% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 5.9% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Cameroon by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Somali (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cameroon are Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |