Burmese vs Czechoslovakian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Czechoslovakian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Burmese
Czechoslovakians
16.7%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Czechoslovakian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,327,059 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,659,789 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 16.6%, a difference of 0.42%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 43.0% | 37.8% |
| Range | 42.6% | 33.2% |
| Mean | 14.8% | 14.3% |
| Median | 14.4% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Czechoslovakians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Slavic (16.7%, a difference of 0.0%), German (16.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (16.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Belgium (16.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Sweden (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Argentinean (16.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from England (16.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Venezuelan (16.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Romanian (16.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Pennsylvania German (16.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Bhutanese | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Romanians | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Venezuelans | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Ukrainians | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Germans | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Slavs | 99.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Estonians | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 16.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 16.7% |