Blackfeet vs Immigrants from Grenada Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Immigrants from Grenada
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Blackfeet
Immigrants from Grenada
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Immigrants from Grenada Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,475,903 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,197,356 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 2.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet | Immigrants from Grenada |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 23.4% | 11.0% |
| Range | 20.7% | 9.9% |
| Mean | 10.1% | 6.4% |
| Median | 9.2% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet and Immigrants from Grenada by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Immigrants from Yemen (7.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Delaware (7.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |