Afghan vs Turkish Female Disability
COMPARE
Afghan
Turkish
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Afghans
Turks
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Turkish Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,868,441 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,848,470 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Turkish |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 25.3% |
| Range | 12.3% | 21.5% |
| Mean | 10.9% | 12.0% |
| Median | 11.0% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Afghans and Turks by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Israeli (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Mongolian (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Malaysia (11.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Egyptian (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (11.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Turkey (11.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Argentineans | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |