Immigrants from Nepal vs Turkish Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Turkish
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Turks
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Turkish Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,780,675 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,848,470 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Turkish |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 24.4% | 25.3% |
| Range | 19.7% | 21.5% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 12.0% |
| Median | 11.1% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Turks by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and Afghan (11.2%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Malaysia (11.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Egyptian (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (11.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |