Chickasaw Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.28% in percentage of married-couple family households.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of married-couple family households within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of married-couple family households due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
South American Indians	28.4 /100 \| #188	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants from Latvia	26.9 /100 \| #189	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants from Kuwait	25.6 /100 \| #190	Fair 46.0%
Choctaw	24.9 /100 \| #191	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants from Northern Africa	24.6 /100 \| #192	Fair 46.0%
Taiwanese	23.4 /100 \| #193	Fair 45.9%
Mexican American Indians	23.3 /100 \| #194	Fair 45.9%
Chickasaw	22.7 /100 \| #195	Fair 45.9%
Immigrants from South America	22.2 /100 \| #196	Fair 45.9%
Cambodians	21.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 45.9%
Ottawa	19.4 /100 \| #198	Poor 45.8%
Carpatho Rusyns	15.7 /100 \| #199	Poor 45.7%
Potawatomi	15.6 /100 \| #200	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants from Serbia	15.2 /100 \| #201	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants from Central America	14.2 /100 \| #202	Poor 45.7%

Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw Data	Married-couple Households Data
Minimum	0.032%	20.0%
Maximum	25.7%	65.4%
Range	25.7%	45.4%
Mean	8.4%	47.8%
Median	7.4%	48.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.6%	43.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.9%	53.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.3%	10.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.1%	8.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.1%	8.6%

Correlation Details

Chickasaw Percentile	Sample Size	Married-couple Households
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032%	136,647,910	43.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25%	5,292,005	49.6%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45%	1,603,236	51.2%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60%	1,611,719	44.7%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83%	822,648	44.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99%	474,840	50.4%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19%	233,583	48.8%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35%	249,739	47.2%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54%	89,231	54.4%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74%	88,765	44.2%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93%	53,323	49.7%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13%	48,029	51.9%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28%	55,156	52.2%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51%	15,979	47.5%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66%	16,025	54.7%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88%	67,875	41.2%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00%	18,539	45.2%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24%	16,118	45.8%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46%	7,995	51.7%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58%	7,909	51.0%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83%	1,750	52.1%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93%	2,773	44.6%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14%	4,957	52.0%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35%	20,308	50.5%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53%	26,620	39.1%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70%	4,529	56.9%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86%	2,552	50.6%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10%	4,663	41.3%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18%	40,906	44.5%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57%	4,596	59.3%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86%	290	51.1%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00%	4,318	39.3%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17%	665	47.9%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36%	6,967	44.2%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51%	215	49.5%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65%	1,234	45.6%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95%	4,633	51.9%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04%	1,108	53.7%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28%	8,632	49.2%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45%	2,925	42.9%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56%	6,148	40.7%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88%	2,449	55.9%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00%	350	56.8%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21%	633	47.2%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29%	4,329	53.2%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60%	651	61.6%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81%	919	59.6%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93%	1,803	42.8%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11%	966	40.4%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44%	4,841	58.8%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69%	351	43.2%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00%	7,518	48.9%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49%	286	63.8%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75%	930	41.1%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95%	5,491	51.2%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15%	1,283	58.7%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54%	208	54.1%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68%	1,516	65.4%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85%	16,629	33.4%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98%	31,368	44.8%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37%	897	59.2%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13%	8,460	43.2%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31%	3,110	27.2%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45%	119	48.9%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64%	560	47.0%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00%	40	20.0%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30%	791	57.2%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79%	190	31.5%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93%	841	53.9%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55%	145	51.4%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79%	262	29.9%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46%	428	26.7%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31%	64	38.7%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05%	114	54.5%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23%	212	38.3%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86%	988	61.7%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81%	189	33.3%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74%	1,286	48.2%

Chickasaw Married-couple Households

COMPARE

Chickasaw Married-couple HouseholdsFair

Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households

Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Chickasaw Married-couple Households
Fair