Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
21.8%
POVERTY | CHILDREN < 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,649,363 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075 and weighted average of 21.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.14% in poverty level among children under the age of 5.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 5 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among children under the age of 5 within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among children under the age of 5 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Blackfeet (21.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Alaskan Athabascan (21.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Hispanic or Latino (21.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Yaqui (21.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and Cherokee (21.7%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants from Central America | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 22.3% |
Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Data |
| Minimum | 0.031% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 56.1% |
| Range | 25.7% | 54.4% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 27.1% |
| Median | 6.6% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 33.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 11.2% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.031% | 135,253,607 | 19.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,959,725 | 18.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,489,877 | 19.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,536,536 | 23.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 803,971 | 24.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 445,706 | 20.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 227,156 | 25.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 241,785 | 21.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 76,783 | 27.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 85,215 | 21.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 52,228 | 18.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 45,142 | 21.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 50,921 | 26.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 23.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 13,050 | 34.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 65,943 | 29.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,243 | 22.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 15,553 | 24.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 18.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.57% | 7,527 | 40.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,306 | 29.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,773 | 19.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 17.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 24.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 23.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 3,375 | 30.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 1,997 | 29.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,833 | 31.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,253 | 22.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 3,476 | 18.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 3,720 | 33.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 438 | 7.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 21.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 31.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.96% | 3,705 | 37.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 668 | 50.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,480 | 20.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.46% | 2,735 | 34.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 26.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 18.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 11.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 36.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 56.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 16.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 37.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 45.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 30.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 46.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 19.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 4,739 | 29.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 48.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 44.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,473 | 1.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 34.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 23.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 28.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 7,470 | 42.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 55.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 33.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 7.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.98% | 488 | 41.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 11.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 15.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 25.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 30.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 25.0% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 10.5% |