Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Wage/Income Gap
Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap
27.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,661,645 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.70% in wage/income gap percentage.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and wage/income gap percentage does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of wage/income gap percentage within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of wage/income gap percentage due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Nonimmigrants (27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
| Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 4.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Osage | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Estonians | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Immigrants from Europe | 3.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Creek | 3.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 3.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Spanish | 3.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Chickasaw | 3.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Immigrants from the Azores | 3.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Celtics | 2.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Cypriots | 2.8 /100 | #248 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 2.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 2.5 /100 | #251 | Tragic 27.3% |
Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Wage/Income Gap Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 60.4% |
| Range | 25.7% | 57.6% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 29.3% |
| Median | 6.5% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 36.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 14.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 12.2% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Wage/Income Gap |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,665,977 | 24.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,303,863 | 29.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,598,695 | 30.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,607,250 | 27.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 819,549 | 31.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 471,448 | 33.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 229,428 | 36.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 247,535 | 30.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 87,689 | 32.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 85,707 | 26.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 52,131 | 37.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 45,714 | 30.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 54,494 | 31.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 32.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 15,432 | 28.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 66,081 | 19.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,053 | 37.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,118 | 28.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 35.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 28.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 27.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,672 | 37.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 22.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 34.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 34.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 3,983 | 49.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 2,002 | 57.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 4,014 | 25.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,388 | 31.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 3,956 | 36.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 188 | 45.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,035 | 24.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.16% | 438 | 34.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 27.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 28.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 40.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 8.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.03% | 854 | 20.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 21.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 26.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 18.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.91% | 2,061 | 9.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 47.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 2.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 29.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 604 | 48.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 55.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92% | 975 | 37.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 38.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 25.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 52.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 25.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 27.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 40.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 15.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,516 | 3.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,537 | 17.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 19.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 26.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13% | 8,460 | 22.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 27.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 41.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 60.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 14.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 13.9% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 22.2% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 13.7% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 12.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 5.7% |