Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Select to Compare
Vision Disability
Chickasaw Vision Disability
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.14% in percentage of population with vision disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with vision disability within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with vision disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw Data | Vision Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.032% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 25.7% | 15.2% |
| Range | 25.7% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 5.4% |
| Median | 7.4% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 2.8% |
Correlation Details
| Chickasaw Percentile | Sample Size | Vision Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 136,635,821 | 2.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 5,297,796 | 2.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,606,035 | 2.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 1,613,297 | 3.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 819,167 | 3.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 473,596 | 3.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 232,024 | 4.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 249,739 | 3.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 88,370 | 3.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 88,533 | 3.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 53,323 | 4.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 48,029 | 4.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 55,156 | 2.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 15,979 | 5.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 14,258 | 3.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 66,143 | 5.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 18,539 | 6.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,118 | 6.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 7,995 | 5.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 7,909 | 4.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 1,750 | 6.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 2,672 | 5.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 4,957 | 4.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 20,308 | 5.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 26,620 | 6.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 4,529 | 6.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 2,307 | 8.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 4,663 | 5.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 40,771 | 6.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57% | 4,596 | 4.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,318 | 3.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17% | 665 | 9.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 6,967 | 5.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 215 | 2.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 1,234 | 4.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95% | 4,633 | 3.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04% | 1,108 | 6.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 8,632 | 7.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45% | 2,925 | 3.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56% | 6,148 | 7.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,449 | 3.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 350 | 3.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 633 | 15.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29% | 4,329 | 4.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 604 | 0.33% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 919 | 6.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92% | 1,245 | 6.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 966 | 11.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,841 | 4.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 268 | 6.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00% | 7,518 | 3.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49% | 286 | 2.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 930 | 4.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 5,491 | 4.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 1,283 | 4.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54% | 208 | 7.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68% | 1,516 | 1.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85% | 16,629 | 2.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98% | 31,368 | 2.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 897 | 5.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13% | 8,460 | 4.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 3,110 | 2.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 119 | 7.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 560 | 10.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 5.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30% | 791 | 4.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 841 | 8.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 145 | 13.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79% | 262 | 4.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.29% | 82 | 9.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46% | 428 | 5.4% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 64 | 6.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 212 | 12.3% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 988 | 4.4% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81% | 189 | 12.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 1,286 | 0.78% |