Chickasaw Divorced or Separated

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,714,015 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently divorced or separated in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286 and weighted average of 14.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.22% in percentage of population currently divorced or separated.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently divorced or separated does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chickasaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population currently divorced or separated within an area, or if Chickasaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population currently divorced or separated due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Divorced or Separated

In terms of divorced or separated, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Colville (14.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Bahamian (14.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Seminole (14.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (14.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and Crow (14.1%, a difference of 0.88%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Divorced or Separated
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 13.9%
Immigrants from Bahamas	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 13.9%
Dutch West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 14.0%
Shoshone	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 14.0%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 14.1%
Choctaw	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 14.1%
Colville	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 14.2%
Chickasaw	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 14.2%
Bahamians	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 14.2%
Seminole	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 14.3%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 14.4%
Cubans	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 14.5%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #345	Tragic 14.5%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #346	Tragic 14.8%
Immigrants from Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #347	Tragic 15.2%

Chickasaw Divorced or Separated Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw Data	Divorced or Separated Data
Minimum	0.032%	4.1%
Maximum	36.8%	43.4%
Range	36.8%	39.3%
Mean	8.7%	16.8%
Median	7.4%	15.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.6%	13.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.9%	18.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.3%	5.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.9%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.8%	5.4%

Correlation Details

Chickasaw Percentile	Sample Size	Divorced or Separated
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032%	136,672,645	12.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25%	5,302,555	13.2%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45%	1,603,236	13.4%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60%	1,614,717	14.6%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83%	826,043	14.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99%	474,840	14.7%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19%	233,583	14.8%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35%	249,739	14.4%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54%	89,231	14.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74%	88,601	17.0%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93%	53,323	15.8%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13%	48,029	16.1%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28%	55,156	14.6%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51%	15,979	16.8%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66%	16,025	14.9%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88%	67,875	18.9%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00%	18,441	19.1%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24%	16,118	16.9%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46%	7,995	13.8%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58%	7,909	15.6%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83%	1,750	13.8%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93%	2,773	16.4%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14%	4,957	15.2%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35%	20,308	18.3%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53%	26,620	19.5%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70%	4,529	15.3%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86%	2,552	13.6%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10%	4,663	21.0%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18%	40,809	18.7%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57%	4,596	12.4%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86%	290	27.7%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00%	4,318	20.2%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17%	665	14.9%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36%	6,967	20.3%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51%	215	13.8%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65%	1,234	15.6%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.95%	4,633	16.8%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.04%	1,108	14.4%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28%	8,632	18.1%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.45%	2,925	16.1%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.56%	6,148	19.5%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88%	2,449	10.1%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00%	350	15.4%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21%	633	11.5%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.29%	4,329	15.7%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60%	651	4.1%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81%	919	16.2%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93%	1,803	21.5%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11%	966	21.8%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44%	4,841	13.8%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69%	351	12.1%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.00%	7,518	17.6%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.49%	286	10.2%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75%	930	12.5%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95%	5,491	13.1%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15%	1,283	13.3%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.54%	208	16.5%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.68%	1,516	12.7%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.85%	16,629	18.1%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.98%	31,368	15.9%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37%	897	18.9%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.13%	8,460	20.6%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31%	3,110	25.0%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45%	119	9.3%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64%	560	22.8%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.30%	791	14.6%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.79%	190	43.4%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93%	841	21.9%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55%	145	12.3%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.79%	262	17.7%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.46%	428	32.0%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31%	64	25.8%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.05%	114	12.6%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23%	212	22.5%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86%	988	10.2%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.81%	189	24.5%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74%	1,286	11.3%
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.79%	106	23.9%

Chickasaw Divorced or Separated

COMPARE

Chickasaw Divorced or SeparatedTragic

Chickasaw Divorced or Separated Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Divorced or Separated

Chickasaw Divorced or Separated Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Chickasaw Divorced or Separated
Tragic