Sudanese vs Czechoslovakian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Sudanese
Czechoslovakian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Sudanese
Czechoslovakians
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Czechoslovakian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,072,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,718,828 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 25.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 0.33% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 86.7% | 16.4% |
Range | 86.3% | 15.7% |
Mean | 10.6% | 6.2% |
Median | 8.4% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.10%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |