Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Czechoslovakian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Czechoslovakians
8.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,284,656 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.366 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,718,828 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 4.3%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Laos | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 0.99% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 16.5% | 16.4% |
Range | 15.5% | 15.7% |
Mean | 7.0% | 6.2% |
Median | 6.9% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Laos and Czechoslovakians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Immigrants from India (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Mexico (8.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Venezuelan (8.1%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and Celtic (8.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.89%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |