Nigerian vs South American Indian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Nigerian
South American Indian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Nigerians
South American Indians
12.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs South American Indian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,141,905 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,483,116 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.020%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nigerian | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.47% | 0.72% |
Maximum | 26.0% | 38.9% |
Range | 25.5% | 38.2% |
Mean | 10.0% | 8.5% |
Median | 8.9% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Nigerians and South American Indians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Latvia (12.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Liberian (12.0%, a difference of 0.74%), Honduran (12.0%, a difference of 0.79%), Macedonian (12.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (11.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Latvia (12.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Liberian (12.0%, a difference of 0.76%), Macedonian (12.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Honduran (12.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (11.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.0 /100 | #247 | Tragic 11.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 1.9 /100 | #248 | Tragic 11.8% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #249 | Tragic 11.8% |
Paiute | 1.8 /100 | #250 | Tragic 11.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 1.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 1.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 11.9% |
Egyptians | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |