Luxembourger vs Ottawa No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Ottawa
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Luxembourgers
Ottawa
5.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Ottawa No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,375,262 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.293 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,929,358 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.455 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 37.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Ottawa |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Maximum | 8.6% | 15.5% |
| Range | 8.0% | 15.0% |
| Mean | 3.9% | 5.8% |
| Median | 3.7% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Ottawa by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 20.2%), English (6.5%, a difference of 21.5%), Danish (6.6%, a difference of 23.0%), Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and German (6.7%, a difference of 24.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Arapaho (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Tongan (7.2%, a difference of 2.9%), Welsh (7.2%, a difference of 3.1%), European (7.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and White/Caucasian (7.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |