Norwegian vs Ottawa No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Norwegian
Ottawa
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Norwegians
Ottawa
6.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Ottawa No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,211,633 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,929,358 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.455 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 14.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Ottawa |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.55% |
Maximum | 14.4% | 15.5% |
Range | 13.0% | 15.0% |
Mean | 5.6% | 5.8% |
Median | 5.4% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Ottawa by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are English (6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Danish (6.6%, a difference of 2.3%), Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 2.7%), German (6.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Nepalese (7.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Arapaho (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Tongan (7.2%, a difference of 2.9%), Welsh (7.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and European (7.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.4% |