Iroquois vs Pennsylvania German No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Iroquois
Pennsylvania German
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Iroquois
Pennsylvania Germans
10.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
17.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
15.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Pennsylvania German No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,994,531 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,622,955 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.48%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Pennsylvania German |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 98.5% | 96.0% |
| Mean | 10.1% | 23.2% |
| Median | 7.3% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 32.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 23.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 18.9% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Pennsylvania Germans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Romanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
| Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
| Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
| Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
| Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
| Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
| Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
| Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
| Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 12.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 10.6 /100 | #215 | Poor 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 10.6 /100 | #216 | Poor 11.2% |