Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Osage 2 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,289,317 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.541 and weighted average of 59.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,799,602 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 58.8%, a difference of 1.4%.

2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Eastern Asia	Osage
Minimum	46.9%	43.5%
Maximum	100.0%	93.5%
Range	53.1%	50.0%
Mean	65.6%	67.8%
Median	64.5%	66.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	60.4%	60.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.0%	74.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.6%	13.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.2%	11.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.1%	11.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Osage by 2 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Taiwan (59.7%, a difference of 0.25%), French (59.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Czechoslovakian (59.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Yaqui (59.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from India (59.3%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Nonimmigrants (58.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Mexican American Indian (58.7%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (58.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish American (58.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Scotland (58.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	2 or more Vehicles in Household
Czechoslovakians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 59.8%
French	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 59.8%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 59.7%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 59.6%
Yaqui	99.9 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 59.3%
Immigrants \| India	99.9 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 59.3%
Belgians	99.9 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 59.3%
Choctaw	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 59.3%
Spaniards	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 59.2%
Immigrants \| Laos	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 59.2%
Celtics	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 59.2%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 59.1%
Luxembourgers	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 59.1%
Chickasaw	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 59.0%
Afghans	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 59.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 58.9%
Spanish Americans	99.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 58.9%
French Canadians	99.8 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 58.9%
Osage	99.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 58.8%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	99.8 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 58.8%
Mexican American Indians	99.8 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 58.7%