Immigrants from Philippines vs Bolivian 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,073,729 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 91.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,646,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 91.5%, a difference of 0.030%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Philippines	Bolivian
Minimum	81.2%	79.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	18.8%	21.0%
Mean	93.4%	94.2%
Median	93.6%	94.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	91.6%	92.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	95.7%	97.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.1%	5.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.8%	3.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.8%	3.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Bolivians by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Iranian (91.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (91.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cuban (91.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (91.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (91.4%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (91.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Iranian (91.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (91.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Lebanese (91.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from England (91.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 91.8%
Palestinians	99.7 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 91.7%
Lithuanians	99.7 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 91.7%
Poles	99.7 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 91.7%
Cajuns	99.7 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 91.7%
Immigrants \| Iran	99.7 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 91.7%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	99.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 91.6%
Portuguese	99.5 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 91.6%
Cubans	99.5 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.4 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 91.5%
Iranians	99.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.4 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 91.5%
Bolivians	99.4 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 91.5%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	99.3 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 91.4%
Lebanese	99.3 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| England	99.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 91.4%
Jordanians	99.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 91.4%
Tsimshian	99.3 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 91.4%
Osage	99.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 91.4%
Immigrants \| Germany	99.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 91.4%
Spanish Americans	99.2 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 91.4%