Immigrants from Moldova vs Nicaraguan 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,288,991 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 90.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,615,163 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.118 and weighted average of 90.4%, a difference of 0.19%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Moldova	Nicaraguan
Minimum	75.5%	74.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	24.5%	25.6%
Mean	93.2%	91.6%
Median	94.1%	92.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	91.4%	89.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	98.1%	95.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.7%	6.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.7%	5.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.6%	5.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Moldova and Nicaraguans by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Moldova are Immigrants from Lithuania (90.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bahamas (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Sioux (90.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Sudanese (90.3%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Marshallese (90.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (90.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Burmese (90.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (90.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (90.4%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| Korea	90.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 90.5%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	89.4 /100 \| #126	Excellent 90.4%
Immigrants \| Azores	89.1 /100 \| #127	Excellent 90.4%
Burmese	89.0 /100 \| #128	Excellent 90.4%
Marshallese	88.9 /100 \| #129	Excellent 90.4%
Nicaraguans	88.8 /100 \| #130	Excellent 90.4%
Immigrants \| Kenya	88.5 /100 \| #131	Excellent 90.4%
Immigrants \| South Africa	88.1 /100 \| #132	Excellent 90.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	87.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 90.4%
Kenyans	87.0 /100 \| #134	Excellent 90.4%
Immigrants \| Oceania	86.9 /100 \| #135	Excellent 90.4%
Hungarians	86.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 90.3%
Latvians	86.3 /100 \| #137	Excellent 90.3%
Syrians	86.3 /100 \| #138	Excellent 90.3%
Estonians	85.6 /100 \| #139	Excellent 90.3%
Sudanese	85.2 /100 \| #140	Excellent 90.3%
Immigrants \| Moldova	83.1 /100 \| #141	Excellent 90.2%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	83.0 /100 \| #142	Excellent 90.2%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	81.5 /100 \| #143	Excellent 90.2%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	81.5 /100 \| #144	Excellent 90.2%
Sioux	81.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 90.2%