Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Barbadian No Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,492,873 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 25.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,232,978 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179 and weighted average of 26.1%, a difference of 1.3%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bangladesh	Barbadian
Minimum	3.9%	1.3%
Maximum	75.0%	69.0%
Range	71.1%	67.7%
Mean	23.3%	19.5%
Median	20.2%	13.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.9%	6.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	29.6%	28.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	19.7%	21.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.0%	16.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	16.9%	16.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh and Barbadians by No Vehicles in Household

In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Vietnamese (26.2%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (26.7%, a difference of 3.5%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (24.6%, a difference of 4.5%), Immigrants from Ecuador (23.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (23.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Vietnamese (26.2%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (26.7%, a difference of 2.2%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (24.6%, a difference of 5.9%), Immigrants from Ecuador (23.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (23.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	No Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 19.6%
Senegalese	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 20.5%
Immigrants \| Senegal	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 21.1%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 22.2%
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 22.8%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 23.7%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 23.7%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 23.8%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 24.6%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 25.8%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 26.1%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 26.2%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 26.7%
Guyanese	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 29.3%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 29.4%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 29.5%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 29.5%
British West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 29.7%
Inupiat	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 29.9%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 31.4%