European vs Norwegian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
European
 Norwegian
 No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Europeans
Norwegians
7.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
European vs Norwegian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,916,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.468 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,211,633 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 10.5%.
 
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | European | Norwegian | 
| Minimum | 0.69% | 1.4% | 
| Maximum | 60.0% | 14.4% | 
| Range | 59.3% | 13.0% | 
| Mean | 9.2% | 5.6% | 
| Median | 5.8% | 5.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 6.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 2.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 2.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Europeans and Norwegians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Welsh (7.2%, a difference of 0.56%), Tongan (7.2%, a difference of 0.78%), White/Caucasian (7.0%, a difference of 1.1%), Mexican (7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Scandinavian (7.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are English (6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Danish (6.6%, a difference of 2.3%), Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 2.7%), German (6.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 5.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household | 
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% | 
| English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% | 
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% | 
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% | 
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% | 
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% | 
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% | 
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% | 
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% | 
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% | 
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% | 
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% | 
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% | 
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% | 
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% | 
| Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |