English vs German No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
English
 German
 No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
English
Germans
6.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs German No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,648,684 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of English and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 573,819,115 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Germans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.317 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 2.6%.
 
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | German | 
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.56% | 
| Maximum | 30.8% | 32.3% | 
| Range | 29.8% | 31.8% | 
| Mean | 7.8% | 6.0% | 
| Median | 5.3% | 5.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 6.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 2.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 4.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 4.0% | 
Demographics Similar to English and Germans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to English are Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Danish (6.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and Swedish (6.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 0.99%), Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Danish (6.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Swedish (6.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and Scotch-Irish (6.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household | 
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% | 
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% | 
| English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% | 
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% | 
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% | 
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% | 
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% | 
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% | 
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% | 
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% | 
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% | 
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% | 
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% | 
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% | 
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% | 
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% | 
| Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |