Seminole vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,443,018 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 292,285,231 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.55%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Seminole	Immigrants from Thailand
Minimum	1.7%	1.8%
Maximum	34.7%	18.1%
Range	33.0%	16.3%
Mean	8.2%	5.5%
Median	5.4%	4.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.3%	3.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	10.0%	6.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.7%	3.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.2%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.0%	3.2%

Demographics Similar to Seminole and Immigrants from Thailand by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Immigrants from Latvia (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Celtic (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Korea (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Eastern European (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Finnish (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Yugoslavian (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Scotland (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Okinawan (5.0%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Immigrants \| Oceania	96.8 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 5.0%
Czechoslovakians	96.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 5.0%
South Africans	96.5 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 5.0%
Romanians	95.5 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 5.0%
Yugoslavians	95.4 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Thailand	95.4 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	95.1 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Scotland	95.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 5.0%
Okinawans	94.7 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Turkey	94.3 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Germany	93.2 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	92.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.7 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	92.7 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 5.0%
Finns	92.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 5.0%
Eastern Europeans	92.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 5.0%
Seminole	91.4 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Latvia	91.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 5.0%
Celtics	91.3 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Korea	91.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 5.0%
Malaysians	90.4 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 5.1%