Seminole vs Choctaw Unemployment
COMPARE
Seminole
Choctaw
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Seminole
Choctaw
5.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Choctaw Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,261,058 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,338,927 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.54%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 21.6% | 19.0% |
| Range | 21.2% | 17.1% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 6.7% |
| Median | 5.5% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Seminole and Choctaw by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Israeli (5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Iroquois (5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Philippines (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and South American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from South America (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Albania (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Bangladeshi (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Delaware (5.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 18.6 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
| Iraqis | 18.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
| Ugandans | 18.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 15.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 15.2 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
| Delaware | 14.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | South America | 13.5 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 13.5 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.4% |
| Choctaw | 12.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.4% |
| Bangladeshis | 11.2 /100 | #219 | Poor 5.4% |
| Soviet Union | 10.6 /100 | #220 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 10.4 /100 | #221 | Poor 5.4% |
| Iroquois | 10.3 /100 | #222 | Poor 5.4% |
| Seminole | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.4% |
| Israelis | 8.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.4% |
| South American Indians | 7.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Samoans | 7.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 6.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Hawaiians | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Ottawa | 5.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.5% |