Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Sweden Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,881,728 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,907,096 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 7.6%, a difference of 3.2%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Potawatomi	Immigrants from Sweden
Minimum	4.7%	6.3%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	95.3%	93.7%
Mean	30.9%	26.1%
Median	19.4%	15.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.6%	9.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	43.0%	25.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	33.4%	16.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	33.1%	29.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	31.8%	27.5%

Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Immigrants from Sweden by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Immigrants from Chile (7.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from China (7.8%, a difference of 0.67%), British West Indian (7.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and Immigrants from Spain (7.8%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Immigrants from Iran (7.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Guyanese (7.6%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.6%, a difference of 0.88%), Cambodian (7.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (7.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 7.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 7.7%
Kiowa	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 7.7%
Ugandans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 7.7%
Colville	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%
Pueblo	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 7.8%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%