Polish vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years
COMPARE
Polish
Czechoslovakian
Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years
Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years Comparison
Poles
Czechoslovakians
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 45 TO 54 YEARS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 45 TO 54 YEARS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,066,106 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Poles and unemployment rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 356,241,688 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.736 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 0.95%.
Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 22.5% | 63.2% |
| Range | 21.5% | 60.3% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 11.5% |
| Median | 4.1% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Czechoslovakians by Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Irish (4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Latvian (4.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Burmese (4.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Basque (4.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Northern European (4.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Zimbabwean (4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (4.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Singapore (4.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 45 to 54 years |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Osage | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.6 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Basques | 99.6 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Irish | 99.5 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Chickasaw | 99.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Latvians | 99.4 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |