Palestinian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,975,975 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,463,754 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.18%.

Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Palestinian	Immigrants from Hong Kong
Minimum	1.7%	1.3%
Maximum	69.5%	21.1%
Range	67.8%	19.8%
Mean	7.7%	6.6%
Median	6.2%	6.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.9%	5.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.0%	7.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.2%	2.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.7%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.6%	2.8%

Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Indian (Asian) (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Kenyan (6.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Malaysia (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from France (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Scandinavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Indian (Asian) (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	98.4 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 6.2%
Luxembourgers	98.3 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	98.3 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 6.2%
Bhutanese	98.2 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| China	98.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 6.2%
Kenyans	98.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	97.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 6.3%
Indians (Asian)	97.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	97.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 6.3%
Palestinians	97.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	97.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	97.5 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| France	97.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 6.3%
Scandinavians	97.4 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 6.3%
Belgians	97.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 6.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	96.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	96.7 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 6.3%
Icelanders	96.6 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 6.3%
Asians	96.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 6.3%