Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
5.0%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 419,508,193 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,685,167 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.66%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 19.7% | 9.1% |
| Range | 17.3% | 8.5% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 4.8% |
| Median | 5.2% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Turkish (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Yugoslavian (5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Czechoslovakian (5.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Bhutanese (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Korea (4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Austrian (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Polish (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Croatians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Irish | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Jordanians | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Lithuanians | 98.5 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.3 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Cambodians | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.0% |