Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Serbia Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 386,833,182 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 55 and 59 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,562,298 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and unemployment rate among population between the ages 55 and 59 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 0.11%.

Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Lithuanian	Immigrants from Serbia
Minimum	1.8%	0.90%
Maximum	30.2%	17.7%
Range	28.4%	16.8%
Mean	8.2%	5.4%
Median	6.0%	4.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.6%	3.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	9.7%	6.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.1%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.1%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.1%	2.9%

Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Serbia by Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Japan (4.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Malaysia (4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from South Africa (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Malaysia (4.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (4.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Pennsylvania German (4.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Sweden (4.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Greek (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years
South American Indians	90.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.7%
Turks	90.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.7%
Asians	90.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Chile	90.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.7%
Whites/Caucasians	90.7 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| South Africa	89.9 /100 \| #120	Excellent 4.7%
Pakistanis	89.7 /100 \| #121	Excellent 4.7%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	89.5 /100 \| #122	Excellent 4.7%
Immigrants \| Japan	89.4 /100 \| #123	Excellent 4.7%
Lithuanians	88.8 /100 \| #124	Excellent 4.7%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	87.9 /100 \| #125	Excellent 4.7%
Immigrants \| Serbia	87.8 /100 \| #126	Excellent 4.7%
Icelanders	87.7 /100 \| #127	Excellent 4.7%
Pennsylvania Germans	87.1 /100 \| #128	Excellent 4.7%
Immigrants \| Sweden	86.8 /100 \| #129	Excellent 4.7%
Greeks	86.6 /100 \| #130	Excellent 4.7%
Immigrants \| Thailand	85.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 4.7%
Immigrants \| Romania	85.3 /100 \| #132	Excellent 4.7%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	84.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 4.7%
Panamanians	84.1 /100 \| #134	Excellent 4.7%
Slavs	83.7 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.7%