Liberian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Liberian
Immigrants from China
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Liberians
Immigrants from China
5.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
24.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,457,938 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 393,737,686 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.80% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 26.0% | 14.3% |
Range | 25.2% | 12.4% |
Mean | 6.4% | 5.7% |
Median | 5.1% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 2.1% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Demographics Similar to Liberians by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Arapaho (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (5.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Cheyenne (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and British West Indian (5.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 5.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 5.8% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 5.8% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 5.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 5.8% |
Armenians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 5.8% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 5.8% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 5.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 5.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 5.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 5.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Denmark (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Cherokee (5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Maltese (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Basque (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Immigrants | Europe | 28.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 28.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.4% |
Basques | 26.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 26.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.4% |
Maltese | 26.4 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.4% |
Cherokee | 25.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 24.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | China | 24.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Costa Ricans | 21.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
Colville | 20.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
Albanians | 17.8 /100 | #198 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 16.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 15.2 /100 | #200 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 5.4% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 14.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 5.4% |