Immigrants from Sweden vs Sri Lankan Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,265,511 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,167,868 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223 and weighted average of 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sweden	Sri Lankan
Minimum	5.5%	0.90%
Maximum	51.1%	27.8%
Range	45.6%	26.9%
Mean	13.7%	6.9%
Median	9.2%	6.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.5%	5.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.3%	7.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.8%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.0%	3.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.4%	3.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sweden and Sri Lankans by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Immigrants from Israel (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Japan (6.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Belarus (6.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Cypriot (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Soviet Union (6.5%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Hmong (6.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Russia (6.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Luxembourger (6.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Asian (6.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 6.5%
Laotians	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 6.5%
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 6.5%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Belarus	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Moldova	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 6.6%
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 6.6%
Yakama	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 6.6%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 6.6%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 6.6%
Hmong	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Russia	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 6.7%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 6.7%
Immigrants \| Cuba	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 6.7%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 6.7%