Immigrants from Sweden vs Burmese Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,265,511 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,459,129 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among women with children under the age of 6 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%.

Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sweden	Burmese
Minimum	5.5%	1.7%
Maximum	51.1%	16.3%
Range	45.6%	14.6%
Mean	13.7%	6.0%
Median	9.2%	5.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.5%	3.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.3%	7.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.8%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.0%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.4%	2.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sweden and Burmese by Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years

In terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Immigrants from Israel (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Japan (6.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Belarus (6.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Cypriot (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Soviet Union (6.5%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Ute (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Mongolian (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Korea (6.5%, a difference of 0.42%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (6.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Bulgarian (6.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Women with Children Under 6 years
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 6.4%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 6.5%
Mongolians	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 6.5%
Ute	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 6.5%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 6.5%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 6.5%
Laotians	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 6.5%
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 6.5%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Japan	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 6.5%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Belarus	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Moldova	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 6.6%
Tsimshian	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 6.6%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 6.6%
Yakama	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 6.6%