Immigrants from Kuwait vs Potawatomi Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,594,540 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,784,914 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 4.6%, a difference of 0.79%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Kuwait	Potawatomi
Minimum	1.0%	0.80%
Maximum	12.8%	40.6%
Range	11.8%	39.8%
Mean	5.5%	10.5%
Median	4.8%	7.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.1%	5.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.2%	10.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.1%	5.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.9%	9.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.8%	9.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kuwait and Potawatomi by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kuwait are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (4.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (4.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uganda (4.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (4.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (4.7%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Slovak (4.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (4.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Northern European (4.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Seminole (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Irish (4.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Northern Europeans	99.3 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 4.6%
Potawatomi	99.3 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 4.6%
Slovaks	99.3 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 4.6%
Immigrants \| Somalia	99.2 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 4.6%
Seminole	99.2 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 4.7%
Irish	99.2 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 4.7%
Icelanders	99.1 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 4.7%
Iroquois	99.1 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 4.7%
Okinawans	99.1 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Egypt	99.1 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 4.7%
Thais	98.9 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	98.9 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.9 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Jordan	98.8 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.7 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	98.7 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Liberia	98.7 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Uganda	98.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 4.7%
Romanians	98.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	98.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	98.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 4.7%