Immigrants from Jordan vs Kenyan Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,849,460 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.366 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,662,123 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.54%.

Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Jordan	Kenyan
Minimum	1.7%	1.9%
Maximum	24.5%	26.0%
Range	22.8%	24.1%
Mean	11.0%	11.5%
Median	10.8%	11.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.1%	10.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.3%	12.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.1%	2.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.5%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.4%	5.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Kenyans by Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

In terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Chilean (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Thailand (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Iroquois (11.3%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from South Africa (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Austrian (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Japan (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.8 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 11.2%
Kenyans	95.7 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 11.2%
Austrians	95.5 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	95.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	95.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	95.1 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Latvia	95.1 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| North America	95.1 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 11.2%
Lithuanians	94.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 11.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	94.4 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	94.4 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 11.3%
Nicaraguans	94.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 11.3%
Estonians	94.2 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 11.3%
Celtics	94.0 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 11.3%
Pakistanis	94.0 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 11.3%
Iroquois	93.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	93.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	93.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	93.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	93.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 11.3%
Chileans	93.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 11.3%