Immigrants from Jordan vs Kenyan Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,177,395 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,555,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.78%.

Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Jordan	Kenyan
Minimum	1.6%	1.2%
Maximum	17.8%	18.8%
Range	16.2%	17.6%
Mean	6.6%	7.0%
Median	6.4%	6.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.1%	5.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.6%	7.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.5%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.7%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.7%	3.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Kenyans by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Korea (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Carpatho Rusyn (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Icelander (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Belgian (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (6.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from China (6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Lebanon (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Indian (Asian) (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Luxembourgers	98.3 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	98.3 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 6.2%
Bhutanese	98.2 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| China	98.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 6.2%
Kenyans	98.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	97.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 6.3%
Indians (Asian)	97.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	97.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 6.3%
Palestinians	97.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	97.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	97.5 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| France	97.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 6.3%
Scandinavians	97.4 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 6.3%
Belgians	97.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 6.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	96.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	96.7 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 6.3%
Icelanders	96.6 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 6.3%
Asians	96.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	96.0 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 6.3%