Immigrants from Israel vs Creek Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Creek
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Creek
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
19.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
15.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Creek Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,717,487 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,704,441 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.44%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Creek |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 8.9% | 16.7% |
| Range | 7.8% | 15.8% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Creek by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Iroquois (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Choctaw (5.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 26.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.3% |
| Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
| Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
| Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
| Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
| Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
| Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
| Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
| Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |