Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Ute Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,108,778 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 7.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,076,650 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.938 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 12.4%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Hong Kong	Ute
Minimum	1.8%	6.2%
Maximum	20.0%	100.0%
Range	18.2%	93.8%
Mean	8.6%	39.1%
Median	8.2%	11.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.0%	6.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	10.2%	100.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.3%	93.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.0%	52.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.0%	43.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ute by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Cambodian (7.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Guyanese (7.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Sweden (7.6%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from Iran (7.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and Immigrants from Israel (7.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Congo (6.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Icelander (7.0%, a difference of 3.3%), Seminole (7.1%, a difference of 4.6%), Immigrants from Switzerland (7.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (7.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Congo	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 6.7%
Ute	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 6.8%
Icelanders	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 7.0%
Seminole	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 7.1%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Zaire	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 7.2%
Armenians	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 7.2%
Chickasaw	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 7.3%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 7.4%
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 7.5%
South Africans	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 7.5%
Immigrants \| Barbados	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%