Immigrants from Eritrea vs Ute Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,061,910 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.176 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,076,650 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.938 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 12.6%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Eritrea	Ute
Minimum	1.1%	6.2%
Maximum	28.6%	100.0%
Range	27.5%	93.8%
Mean	9.8%	39.1%
Median	7.8%	11.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.4%	6.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.9%	100.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.5%	93.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.7%	52.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.6%	43.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eritrea and Ute by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eritrea are Cambodian (7.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Guyanese (7.6%, a difference of 0.75%), Immigrants from Sweden (7.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Iran (7.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Icelander (7.0%, a difference of 3.3%), Seminole (7.1%, a difference of 4.6%), Immigrants from Switzerland (7.2%, a difference of 5.7%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (7.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and Immigrants from Zaire (7.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Ute	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 6.8%
Icelanders	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 7.0%
Seminole	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 7.1%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 7.2%
Immigrants \| Zaire	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 7.2%
Armenians	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 7.2%
Chickasaw	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 7.3%
Cypriots	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 7.4%
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 7.4%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 7.5%
South Africans	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 7.5%
Immigrants \| Barbados	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 7.6%
Guyanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%