Immigrants from Egypt vs Indonesian Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,094,577 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,720,691 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 0.79%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Egypt	Indonesian
Minimum	2.5%	1.1%
Maximum	33.9%	61.4%
Range	31.4%	60.3%
Mean	11.5%	11.1%
Median	7.6%	8.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.1%	6.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.8%	13.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.7%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.5%	10.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.2%	10.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt and Indonesians by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from Malaysia (7.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Bahamian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Moroccan (7.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Latvia (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and Filipino (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Immigrants from Morocco (7.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Uruguayan (7.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Albania (7.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Iranian (7.9%, a difference of 0.20%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 7.8%
Moroccans	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 7.8%
Bahamians	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Egypt	100.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 7.9%
Filipinos	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 7.9%
Ottawa	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 7.9%
Iranians	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 7.9%
Indonesians	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 7.9%
Uruguayans	99.9 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Albania	99.9 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.9 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	99.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 7.9%
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 7.9%
Immigrants \| Austria	99.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 8.0%