Immigrants from Denmark vs Pueblo Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,267,955 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.818 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,150,940 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.912 and weighted average of 7.7%, a difference of 0.30%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Denmark	Pueblo
Minimum	5.8%	4.1%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	94.2%	95.9%
Mean	39.1%	26.3%
Median	14.0%	15.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.2%	6.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	90.7%	36.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	80.4%	30.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	40.2%	34.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	38.6%	31.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Pueblo by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from Spain (7.8%, a difference of 0.040%), British West Indian (7.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from China (7.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (7.7%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (7.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Spain (7.8%, a difference of 0.33%), British West Indian (7.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Colville (7.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and Ugandan (7.7%, a difference of 0.40%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 7.6%
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 7.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 7.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 7.7%
Kiowa	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 7.7%
Ugandans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 7.7%
Colville	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 7.7%
Pueblo	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 7.7%
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Spain	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 7.8%
British West Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 7.8%
Creek	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Chile	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 7.8%
Potawatomi	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 7.8%
Immigrants \| Latvia	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 7.8%
Moroccans	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 7.8%
Bahamians	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 7.8%