Immigrants from Cuba vs Danish Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
 Danish
 Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Danes
4.6%
UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Danish Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,813,877 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.388 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,550,686 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 6.3%.
 
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Danish | 
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.70% | 
| Maximum | 9.8% | 37.5% | 
| Range | 8.8% | 36.8% | 
| Mean | 4.6% | 5.2% | 
| Median | 4.7% | 3.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 6.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 6.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Danes by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Belgian (4.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Pennsylvania German (4.6%, a difference of 0.40%), European (4.6%, a difference of 0.48%), English (4.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Chinese (4.7%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Czech (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Luxembourger (4.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 2.3%), German (4.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and Norwegian (4.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment | 
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #1  | Exceptional 4.2%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #2  | Exceptional 4.3%  | 
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #3  | Exceptional 4.3%  | 
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4  | Exceptional 4.3%  | 
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 4.4%  | 
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 4.5%  | 
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 4.5%  | 
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 4.5%  | 
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 4.5%  | 
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| English | 100.0 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 4.6%  | 
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 4.7%  |